Tagged with: PredictiveCoding

Subscribe

Recent Posts

June 22nd, 2018

Why Were Search Terms for Both Sides Rejected by an Ohio Magistrate Judge?

June 20th, 2018

Are Discovery Disputes in Bankruptcy Court Subject to FRCP?

June 18th, 2018

SDNY Order Provides That Special Master Review 3,300 Page Privilege Log

  • Categories

  • ILS Newsletters

    • Latest Trends and eDiscovery Case Law Newsletters
    • FRCP

    • Issue Coding

    • Latest Trends and eDiscovery Case Law Newsletters

    • Predictive Coding

    Posted on January 9th, 2017 by

    Parties Disagreed on the Outcome of a Three-Year Electronic Discovery Dispute Starting in 2013, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue has been embroiled in an electronic discovery dispute that may have finally been resolved in Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership v. Commissioner of Interval Revenue, 143 T.C. 183 (2014). Petitioner in the case sought court permission to …

    No Comments
    • FRCP

    • Issue Coding

    • Latest Trends and eDiscovery Case Law Newsletters

    • Litigation Holds

    • Predictive Coding

    Posted on November 16th, 2016 by

    Each week, our plaintiff electronic discovery firm publishes summaries of the top eDiscovery case law opinions and notes the trends taking place throughout the country. One trend we’ve seen this year includes the rise of requests for terminating sanctions for electronic discovery violations. Additionally, we continue to see more cases regarding predictive coding, as this …

    No Comments
    • Issue Coding

    • Latest Trends and eDiscovery Case Law

    • Predictive Coding

    Posted on November 2nd, 2016 by

    In re Viagra Products Liability Litigation, 16-02691 (N.D. Cali., Oct. 14, 2016) is a multi-district litigation (MDL) against drug company Pfizer.  The litigation is based upon allegations of a correlation between anti-impotence drug Viagra and the incidence of melanoma in Viagra users. Fourteen separate lawsuits were consolidated into the California based MDL, and pretrial proceedings …

    No Comments
    • FRCP

    • Issue Coding

    • Latest Trends and eDiscovery Case Law

    • Predictive Coding

    Posted on September 21st, 2016 by

    Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership et. al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Consolidated Case Nos. 2685-11 and 8393-12 (U.S. Tax Court, D.C., July 13, 2016) involves Petitioners’ disputes over adjustments to tax returns. During discovery, the government objected to Petitioners’ use of predictive coding (also called technology assisted review (TAR)) to identify responsive and/or privileged data …

    No Comments