Tagged with: Discovery

Subscribe

Recent Posts

June 22nd, 2018

Why Were Search Terms for Both Sides Rejected by an Ohio Magistrate Judge?

June 20th, 2018

Are Discovery Disputes in Bankruptcy Court Subject to FRCP?

June 18th, 2018

SDNY Order Provides That Special Master Review 3,300 Page Privilege Log

  • Categories

  • ILS Newsletters

    • Latest Trends and eDiscovery Case Law Newsletters
    • Electronic Discovery

    • Sanctions

    • Spoliation

    Posted on March 14th, 2018 by ilsteam

    In Dotson, et al. v. Edmonson, et al., No. 16-15371, (E.D. La. Jan. 22, 2018), the issue considered by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana was whether sanctions were warranted based upon claims of spoliation re phone records.  Lyle Dotson, et al., (“Plaintiff”) moved for sanctions arguing that Defendants Col. …

    No Comments
    • Where’s ILS

    Posted on February 22nd, 2018 by ilsteam

    ILS will be attending multiple conferences in the following weeks. We are attending the eDiscovery Negotiation Training: Practical Cooperative Strategies seminar hosted by the Sedona Conference Institute today and tomorrow. On Monday, we will be at HarrisMartin’s California Wildfire Litigation conference, which will address legal issues surrounding the recent wildfires. On March 2, we will …

    No Comments
    • Electronic Discovery

    • Email

    Posted on February 9th, 2018 by ilsteam

    In Rabang, et al., v. Kelly et al., No. 2:17-cv-00088-JCC, U.S. Dist. Ct. (W.D. Wash. 2017) the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington compelled the Defendants to produce multiple documents after, as the Court described, Defendants stonewalled Plaintiffs in their requests. Defendant has refused to produce responsive documents in his possession, …

    No Comments
    • Electronic Discovery

    • Email

    • Sanctions

    Posted on February 5th, 2018 by ilsteam

    In Doctors Pathology Servs., PA v. Gerges, C.A. No 11457-CB (Del. Ch. Feb. 15, 2017), the  court demanded that parties be specific as to which discovery requests were problematic, including providing specific numbers of discovery requests listed in the Motion to Compel. Here, Plaintiff had sued a former employee and the employee’s new medical practice …

    No Comments
    • eDiscovery

    • Electronic Discovery

    Posted on January 22nd, 2018 by ilsteam

    In Rabin v. Pricewaterhousecoopers, LLP, No. 16-cv-02276-JST (N.D. Cal. Aug. 8, 2017), Plaintiffs sought document production to begin on a rolling basis from August to October at the same time as the TAR model was iteratively refined and checked for accuracy. This timeline, Plaintiffs argued, would allow them to use the discovery in their conditional …

    No Comments