• Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us
  • ILS
  • Sales
  • Support
  • Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us

February 1, 2017

Plaintiff Not Required to Produce Metadata when Defendant Failed to Request It

by Alan Brooks

Produce MetadataIn Mr. Mudbug, Inc. v. Bloomin’ Brands, Inc., Case No. 15-5265 (E.D. La., Jan. 11, 2017), Plaintiff allegedly expanded its facilities to meet the requirements of Defendant’s contract, but then Defendant allegedly diverted business from Plaintiff and ultimately withdrew the entire contract. Defendant countersued for breach of contract. During litigation, Defendant served two sets of discovery requests, to which Planitff served responses. After switching to a new attorney, Defendant identified numerous deficiencies in Plaintiff’s responses, namely that Plaintiff failed to identify documents responsive to each request, and did not produce ESI in accordance with FRCP 34. Defendant attempted to resolve the issue by sending a letter and an email, but Plaintiff did not respond to either meet and confer attempt.  Defendant then filed a Motion to Compel.

Plaintiff argued that Defendant did not satisfy the meet and confer requirement, that the motion was untimely, and that it had addressed the ESI issue by providing Defendant with a thumb drive.

The court noted that ESI must be produced either in the way that it is ordinarily kept in the normal course of business, or in a “reasonably usable form.” FRCP 34 permits parties to choose the format for ESI production. The requests by Defendant, the court found, were “competing” in that one request asked for ESI in the format in which it was maintained in the ordinary course of business, while later in the same request, Defendant asked for PDF or Word format. In its motion, Defendant now sought native format for the ESI. The court found that Plaintiff did produce responsive documents in PDF format and that Plaintiff was not required to produce metadata, as Defendant did not request such in its inital discovery requests. The court held that Defendant is the “master of its production requests” and must be satisfied with what it has asked for.

The court granted the Motion to Compel as to Plaintiff’s responses lacking specificity.  It denied the remainder of Defendant’s motion re FRCP 34 ESI compliance issues.

ILS – Plaintiff Electronic Discovery Experts

Categories: Document Production, eDiscovery Case Law, FRCP, Metadata, Motions to Compel

Tags: FRCP 34

ILS
17744 Sky Park Circle, Suite 270
Irvine, CA 92614
(888) 313-4457
sales@ilsteam.com
  • About ILS
  • Consulting
  • Forensics & Collections
  • Review Platform Hosting & Management
  • Managed Review
  • Sales
  • Support
  • LinkedIn
  • X

© 2025 ILS.

  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Statement
  • Terms of Use/Legal
ILS
Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}