• Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us
  • ILS
  • Sales
  • Support
  • Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us

November 27, 2013

PDF Files Without Metadata: Acceptable Defense Production?

by Alan Brooks

If a defense production is tendered as electronic data in PDF form, non-searchable and without metadata, does it meet the discovery requirements of Fed.R.Civ. Pro. 34? Or do plaintiffs have grounds to object and request an order of court compelling the production in native file format?

This question is but one issue at hand in an order dated November 7, 2013 in Crissen V. Gupta, et al., No. 2:12-cv-355-JMS-WGH (S.D. In. 2013).

The defense production was produced in PDF formatting without metadata. However, plaintiffs noted that the documents’ file names ended in “.doc” and “.docx,” indicating they were originally Microsoft Word documents. If they had been tendered in Word form, their native form, metadata would have been included in the production (such as the date and time the document was created, when it was altered, if and when it was printed, etc.) Defendant countered that the plaintiff electronic discovery request did not specify in what format to produce the data, did not ask for native files or Word documents and that he was not required to produce the data in more than one format.

The court looked to Fed.R.Civ.P. 34, which allows for discovery requests to specify the format of the production, and the court noted that plaintiff’s requests did not specify native format or Word format. However, Rule 34 also states that a “party must produce documents as they are kept in the usual course of business…if a request does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, a party must produce it in a form or forms in which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.” The court cited an Advisory Committee Notes from 2006, which noted that parties are not free to convert ESI into an inefficient format.

Therefore, the court needed more information. If the defendant only had the electronic data in PDF format, then the production was acceptable.  If he had the electronic data in Word format and purposely converted the Word files to PDF files, then he must produce the data again in native format with metadata.

ILS – Plaintiff eDiscovery Experts

Categories: Document Production

Tags: metadata, native file, plaintiff ediscovery, plaintiff electronic discovery

ILS
17744 Sky Park Circle, Suite 270
Irvine, CA 92614
(888) 313-4457
sales@ilsteam.com
  • About ILS
  • Consulting
  • Forensics & Collections
  • Review Platform Hosting & Management
  • Managed Review
  • Sales
  • Support
  • LinkedIn
  • X

© 2025 ILS.

  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Statement
  • Terms of Use/Legal
ILS
Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}