• Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us
  • ILS
  • Sales
  • Support
  • Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us

October 6, 2014

Can Metadata Uncover Altered Photographs for Insurance Disputes?

by Alan Brooks

Metadata, or data about data, can uncover a multitude of information about all types of electronic data, including but not limited to digital photographs. In Knoderer v. State Farm Lloyds, et al., No. 06-13-00027-CV (Ct.App. Tx. 6th Dist. Sept. 19, 2014), a residential insurance dispute, both sides accused the other of altering photographic evidence of a pipe leak. The trial court found that Knoderer, the claimant, had altered photographs and therefore entered discovery sanctions deemed a “procedural death sentence,” meaning entering a judgment in favor of State Farm and monetary fines over one million dollars against Knoderer.

During discovery of the underlying claim, Knoderer had provided six digital photographs in paper form, PDF format, in PDF format with printed metadata, and in JPEG format with metadata deleted. Later and under court order, Knoderer provided the photographs in native format.

State Farm’s expert testified that, after examining the digital photographs and metadata in native form, that the “date/time” had been altered to appear as though it had been taken the day after the alleged pipe leak. Additionally, the metadata filed was set to “WRK,” which the expert testified was not available until after an update which occurred after the date Knoderer claimed the photo was taken. Finally, the expert testified the metadata revealed the shuttercount values confirmed a gap in the automated numbering, establishing a later date the pictures were taken.

Knoderer claimed that the metadata could be explained by corruption of the files. The trial court ordered Knoderer to not alter anything and to preserve and produce all hard drivers, CDs and flash drives containing the photographs. State Farm performed an examination and alleged that the files had been deleted and overridden by two types of scrubbing software on the hard drive. There was also a digital receipt on the computer from the purchase of the scrubbing software the day after the court ordered the hard drives to be preserved and produced.

The appeals court deferred to the trial court’s finding that State Farm’s expert on metadata was persuasive and that the photographs had, in fact, been altered. However, the appeals court did find the monetary sanctions to be excessive and reduced the amount of attorney fees and costs relating only to the sanctionable conduct, not the entire case.

ILS – Plaintiff Electronic Discovery Experts

Categories: Attorney Fees, eDiscovery, eDiscovery Case Law, ESI, Metadata, Spoliation

ILS
17744 Sky Park Circle, Suite 270
Irvine, CA 92614
(888) 313-4457
sales@ilsteam.com
  • About ILS
  • Consulting
  • Forensics & Collections
  • Review Platform Hosting & Management
  • Managed Review
  • Sales
  • Support
  • LinkedIn
  • X

© 2025 ILS.

  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Statement
  • Terms of Use/Legal
ILS
Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}