• Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us
  • ILS
  • Sales
  • Support
  • Technologies
    • Review Platforms
    • ILS Social Media Data Analysis Suite
  • Consulting & Services
    • Consulting
    • Forensics & Collections
    • Review Platform Hosting & Management
    • Managed Review
    • Our Experts
  • AI Resources
  • ILS Articles
  • Company
    • About Us
    • Careers
    • Support
    • Contact Us

July 14, 2014

Can Defendants Produce Non-Searchable PDFs Rather than Native File Formatting?

by Alan Brooks

In Dixon v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc. and Green Tree Servicing, LLC (N.D. Ind. June 25, 2014), Plaintiff alleged Defendants reported inaccurate information in his credit file about his mortgage account in violation of 15 U.S.C. § 1681 et al., the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”).

Plaintiff eDiscovery requests were served upon on Defendant, who produced 966 pages of documents in unsearchable PDF formatting. Defendants claimed what they produced was the only relevant, responsive documents. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Compel, seeking:

1. All ESI in native file format, which was requested but not objected to, and not tendered in the defense production. Plaintiff argued the defense kept the ESI in the usual course of business in electronic searchable form, but converted it to non-searchable PDF paper documents for the production.

2. A search and production of all email communications. Plaintiff alleged internal email communications would shed light on policies regarding reporting information on credit reports to show whether the reporting done was reasonably. Although Defendants claimed no relevant email chains existed, they admitted they never even ran a search.

3. To overrule Defendant’s objections to the discovery that stated requests for data regarding § 1681(g) was an irrelevant claim, and therefore the ESI request was overly broad and burdensome.

The court agreed the ESI should be produced in native file format, as originally requested by Plaintiff; the court agreed that an email search for relevant data must be done. The court held Plaintiff’s  §1681(g) claim was relevant and therefore, Defendants can file an amended response with this in mind to object to the specific requests.

ILS – Plaintiff eDiscovery Experts

Categories: Document Production, eDiscovery, eDiscovery Case Law, ESI, Metadata

ILS
17744 Sky Park Circle, Suite 270
Irvine, CA 92614
(888) 313-4457
sales@ilsteam.com
  • About ILS
  • Consulting
  • Forensics & Collections
  • Review Platform Hosting & Management
  • Managed Review
  • Sales
  • Support
  • LinkedIn
  • X

© 2025 ILS.

  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Statement
  • Terms of Use/Legal
ILS
Manage Cookie Consent
We use cookies to optimize our website and our service.
Functional Always active
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
Preferences
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
Statistics
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
Marketing
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
View preferences
{title} {title} {title}