Latest Trends and eDiscovery Case Law


Recent Posts

September 30th, 2016

Court Accepts Privilege Log Created by Combination of Technology-Assisted Review and Manual Review

September 28th, 2016

Court Denies Request for Forensic Examination of Computers To Locate Missing Email

September 26th, 2016

Court Declines to Compel Plaintiff to Recategorize CD-ROM Files Under FRCP 34(b)

  • Categories

  • Posted on September 30th, 2016 by International Litigation Services

    In Portland Pipe Line Corp. et. al. v. City of South Portland et. al., Case No. 15-00054 (D. Maine, Sept. 8, 2016), Plaintiff brought suit against the Defendant municipality seeking declaratory and injunctive relief regarding an ordinance prohibiting the loading of crude oil in Portland Harbor, Maine. Plaintiff alleged that the ordinance had prevented Plaintiff from transporting oil …

    No Comments
    Posted on September 28th, 2016 by International Litigation Services

    AP Links, LLC et. al. v. Russ et. al., Case No. 09-5437 (E.D. N.Y., Sept. 7, 2016) is a business torts case involving a golf course consulting agreement, a large revolving credit facility, and alleged misconduct by an attorney and his law firm. During discovery, the court issued an order denying a request by Plaintiffs …

    No Comments
    Posted on September 26th, 2016 by International Litigation Services

    In Sky Medical Supply, Inc. v. SCS Support Claim Services, Inc. et. al., Case No. 12-6383 (E.D. N.Y., Sept. 7, 2016), Plaintiff sued Defendants under the Federal Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act (RICO) for mail fraud as well as for common law fraud, aiding and abetting, unjust enrichment and tortious interference. During discovery, the …

    No Comments
    Posted on September 23rd, 2016 by International Litigation Services

    In Oorah, Inc. d/b/a Cucumber Communications v. Covista Communications, al., Case No. 652316/2011 (Supreme Court of New York, New York County, Aug. 23, 2016), the parties asserted claims against each other for breach of contract for failure to make payments due under their agreements. Plaintiff also asserted breach of fiduciary duty claims against Defendant …

    No Comments
    Posted on September 21st, 2016 by International Litigation Services

    Dynamo Holdings Limited Partnership et. al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Consolidated Case Nos. 2685-11 and 8393-12 (U.S. Tax Court, D.C., July 13, 2016) involves Petitioners’ disputes over adjustments to tax returns. During discovery, the government objected to Petitioners’ use of predictive coding (also called technology assisted review (TAR)) to identify responsive and/or privileged data …

    No Comments