Search Articles By Category or Keyword

Motions to Compel

Posted on April 20th, 2018 by ilsteam

In Leidig v. Buzzfeed, Inc., No. 16 Civ. 542 (VM) (GWG), (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 19, 2017), the Plaintiffs, Michael Leidig, et al.(“Plaintiffs”) sued Buzzfeed, Inc. (“Defendant”) for accusing them of selling “fake news.”  Plaintiffs argue that the article defamed them by disputing the veracity and news gathering efforts behind specific stories sold or published by Plaintiffs. …

Posted on April 2nd, 2018 by ilsteam

In The Physicians Alliance Corporation v. WellCARE Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc., No. 16-203-SDD-RLB, (Dist. Court, MD Louisiana 2018) the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana considered motions regarding Defendant’s alleged failure to adequately produce discovery. The Physicians Alliance Corporation (“Plaintiff”) brought this action against WellCare Health Insurance of Arizona, Inc. …

Posted on March 28th, 2018 by ilsteam

In Crabtree v. Experian Information Sols., No. 1:16-cv-10706, (N.D. Ill. Oct. 20, 2017), the Court was asked to determine a dispute about whether a party’s internal communications were privileged, pursuant to the motion to compel filed by Plaintiff Quentin Crabtree (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Defendant”). The discovery dispute arose from an internal …

Posted on March 23rd, 2018 by ilsteam

In Performance Pulsation Control, Inc. v. Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC, No. 4:17-CV-00450, (E.D. Tex. Jan. 23, 2018), Performance Pulsation Control, Inc., (“PPC”) alleges that Justin Manley (“J. Manley”), a former employee, formed a competing company, Sigma Drilling Technologies, LLC (“Sigma”), to market and sell pulsation control products that he developed within the course of his …

Posted on February 21st, 2018 by ilsteam

In Rembrandt Diagnostics LLP v. Innovacon, Inc., No. 3:16-cv-0698 CAB (NLS), (S.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2017), the dispute was over drug-testing cups for screening urine samples. The Plaintiff, Rembrandt Diagnostics, LP (“Rembrandt”), alleged that the Defendant, Innovacon, Inc. (“Innovacon”), breached the patent license agreement established between both companies’ predecessors. Innovacon argued that it did not …