Search Articles By Category or Keyword

eDiscovery

Posted on December 13th, 2017 by ilsteam

In Tillman v. Ally Financial Inc., No. 2:16-cv-313-FtM-99CM, Dist. Court, (M.D. Florida, 2017), the Court considered Defendant’s motion to compel inspection of Plaintiff’s cell phone. On April 28, 2016, Plaintiff initiated this lawsuit against Defendant, alleging that Defendant violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”). Plaintiff claimed that in or around December 2015, Defendant called …

Posted on December 11th, 2017 by ilsteam

In Winfield v. City of New York, No. 15-cv-05236, Dist. Court (S.D.N.Y., 2017), a lengthy dispute between residents and the city regarding the availability of affordable housing led to contentious discovery. Defendant New York City’s current goal is to build or preserve 200,000 below-market-rate apartments by 2024 as part of its affordable housing programs. This …

Posted on November 29th, 2017 by ilsteam

The action and attendant discovery disputes in United States v. New Mexico State University, No. 1:16-cv-0911-JAP-LF (D.N.M. Sep. 29, 2017) arose out of allegations of gender based pay discrimination purportedly committed by employer New Mexico State University, in violation of the provisions of Title VII of the Equal Pay Act. Defendants New Mexico State University …

Posted on November 15th, 2017 by ilsteam

In Catrinar v. Wynnestone Communities Corporation, No. 14-1872, (E.D. Mich., 2017), although Plaintiff claimed Defendants created fake email evidence, the Court declined to issue sanctions. On May 9, 2014, Plaintiff Lawrence Catrinar filed suit against his former employer Defendant Wynnestone Communities Corporation and and its representative Gilbert B. Silverman (“Defendants”) alleging violations of the Family …

Posted on November 13th, 2017 by ilsteam

In UnitedHealthCare of Florida v. American Renal Associates, LLC, No. 16-cv-81180-Marra/Matthewman (S.D. Fla., 2017), Plaintiffs filed a Motion to Reconsider a discovery ruling from August of 2017. Defendants filed a response and Plaintiffs replied. In August, the Court permitted Defendants to select an additional 16 custodians and an additional 12 search terms and to request …